Can technology destroy the New World Order?

It is not true necessarily that small is beautiful; so-called natural monopolies like gas and electricity can operate only on a large scale. Likewise everything from car manufacturers to supermarkets are able to produce and distribute goods incredibly cheaply due to economies of scale. Tinned food is a classic, everyday example of this. Specialisation, including by entire nations, facilitates the production of food or goods profitably which can be exported, boosting trade with the world, and increasing their own wealth. What though if suddenly none of this mattered?

First, let us look at what is actually happening. For decades, conspiratorial élites like the Trilateral Commission - founded 1973; the Bilderberg Group - founded in 1954; and the aforementioned CFR, have been peddling the same message, namely that this is one world, we are all in this together, and in order to solve the enormous problems the world faces we have to cooperate as one, ie we must all surrender out sovereignty to a world supra-government.

A world government means, in their eyes, that nation states are obsolete, which is why there has been such a concerted attack on nationalism, in the West at any rate. This ideal of a benevolent, all-powerful world government is as old as the hills. The reality though is that nothing and no one all-powerful is ever benevolent. Under a world government, people will have what rights our masters give us, not those endowed upon us by our Creator - as the saying goes.

So far, the attempt to create this world government, through the United Nations and before that through the League of Nations, has been a resounding failure, but the conspirators are pressing on undeterred, even though the secret is now out in the open, as the heavy alternative and even mainstream media presence at recent Bilderberg meetings attests. One of the more subtle ways the power élites have attempted to abolish nation states is with international treaties. One prerequisite to the imposition of tyranny is the disarming of the population. Recent gun outrages in the United States - such as Sandy Hook - have led to calls for the curtailment of the private ownership of guns. While most people would agree that it is not a good idea for ordinary folk to walk around the streets carrying high powered automatic firearms, there are those who want to go much further, but there is a little thing called the Constitution of the United States standing in their way. What though if the US were to sign an international treaty that called for the abolition of all guns held in private hands? That would over-ride the Constitution - treaties do. Ditto with censorship, especially of the Internet. Now that you know what is the problem, the big question is, what can we do about it?

Most people don’t give a stuff about international treaties or anything else as long as they’ve got money in their pockets, and this is where new technology can break the stranglehold of the conspirators, if we can harness it.

What does the world need, increasingly? Food, energy, consumer goods. As long as we have those, we don’t need that much in the way of infrastructure. If that claim sounds bizarre, consider this. With the advent of the Internet, most office workers could telecommute. A lot of people work from home already, but a great deal of office work doesn’t need an office, or even to be done at all.

The City of London and other financial centres shuffle money around all day long day in, day out, yet the vast majority of such transactions are not investments, they are gambling pure and simple. How else can a parrot outperform professional investors by picking out shares with its beak?

If the governments of the world were to shut down all managed funds - including pension funds - people could be left free to invest their own money on their own account, as a few choose to do. This would free up enormous superfluous office space and reduce wasteful expenditure on things such as advertising and overpaid economists, be they (ostensibly) free market or not so.

Distance learning, including by YouTube could further reduce the need for travel. Instead of allowing the banks to create money as an interest-bearing debt, money could be issued to and distributed through the Internet, not as Bitcoin but as regular dollars and other currencies paid to the creators of wealth.

These are all things we could do today, theoretically, but look into the future and imagine what could be done by harnessing new technologies, and ones that are already being developed.

The world may run on electricity, but most of that electricity comes from oil in one form or another. Although oil can be extracted from the Earth virtually for free, it is expensive to transport. It is also fair to say that most of the wars of the previous century and of this one are related in some way to oil and other forms of energy. But what if we didn’t need oil to produce energy? The demand for it wouldn’t dry up, but it would surely shrink to a tiny fraction of what it is now.

Solar energy, wave power and wind power have been with us for a long time. Some quite massive projects of this nature are already underway, but of late another environmentally friendly way of producing electricity has been developed - harnessing it from plants SaveFrom.net. This is likely to be useful only on a small scale, but imagine combining this with aquaponics to provide cheap, fresh food for a village, and free or near free electricity.